Join MultiplyOpen a Free ShopSign InHelp
MultiplyLogo
SEARCH

When words fail, Music Speaks right Straight-to-the-Point ...

"No answers.... "

This article is being reposted from:
http://pmelendres.multiply.com/journal/item/125/No_More_Newly_Imported_Books_in_the_Philippines_-_the_Reason_Why

In the last few months, the importation of books into the Philippines has virtually stopped. The reason why is explained in this article by Robin Hemley, a University of Iowa creative writing professor currently on a fellowship in the Philippines. 

If you have no time to read the article, the essence is that the Bureau of Customs has decided to impose duties on the importation of books into the Philippines.

This, despite the 1950 Florence Agreement on the Importation of Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials (which you can see here), which the Philippines ratified in 1979. The preamble of the agreement states: "Considering that the free exchange of ideas and knowledge and, in general, the widest possible dissemination of the diverse forms of self-expression used by civilizations are vitally important both for intellectual progress and international understanding, and consequently for the maintenance of world peace...", an indisputable proposition.  

Here's an excerpt from Robin Hemley's article: 

...Over coffee one afternoon, a book-industry professional (whom I can't identify) told me that for the past two months virtually no imported books had entered the country, in part because of the success of one book, Twilight by Stephenie Meyer. The book, an international best seller, had apparently attracted the attention of customs officials. When an examiner named Rene Agulan opened a shipment of books, he demanded that duty be paid on it.

The importer of Twilight made a mistake and paid the duty requested. A mistake because such duty flies in the face of the Florence Agreement, a U.N. treaty that was signed by the Philippines in 1952, guaranteeing the free flow of "educational, scientific, and cultural materials" between countries and declaring that imported books should be duty-free. Mr. Agulan told the importer that because the books were not educational (i.e., textbooks) they were subject to duty. Perhaps they aren't educational, I might have argued, but aren't they "cultural"?

No matter. With this one success under their belt, customs curtailed all air shipments of books entering the country. Weeks went by as booksellers tried to get their books out of storage and started intense negotiations with various government officials. 

What doubly frustrated booksellers and importers was that the explanations they received from various officials made no sense. It was clear that, for whatever reason—perhaps the 30-billion-peso ($625 million) shortfall in projected customs revenue—customs would go through the motions of having a reasonable argument while in fact having none at all. 

Customs Undersecretary Espele Sales explained the government's position to a group of frustrated booksellers and importers in an Orwellian PowerPoint presentation, at which she reinterpreted the Florence Agreement as well as Philippine law RA 8047, providing for "the tax and duty-free importation of books or raw materials to be used in book publishing." For lack of a comma after the word "books," the undersecretary argued that only books "used in book publishing" (her underlining) were tax-exempt. 

"What kind of book is that?" one publisher asked me afterward. "A book used in book publishing." And she laughed ruefully. 

I thought about it. Maybe I should start writing a few. Harry the Cultural and Educational Potter and His Fondness for Baskerville Type. 

Likewise, with the Florence Agreement, she argued that only educational books could be considered protected by the U.N. treaty. Customs would henceforth be the arbiter of what was and wasn't educational. 

"For 50 years, everyone has misinterpreted the treaty and now you alone have interpreted it correctly?" she was asked. 

"Yes," she told the stunned booksellers. 

Throughout February and March, bookstores seemed on the verge of getting their books released—all their documents were in order, but the rules kept changing. Now they were told that all books would be taxed: 1 percent for educational books and 5 percent for noneducational books. A nightmare scenario for the distributors; they imagined each shipment being held for months as an examiner sorted through the books. Obviously, most would simply pay the higher tax to avoid the hassle. 

Distributors told me they weren't "capitulating" but merely paying under protest. After all, customs was violating an international treaty that had been abided by for over 50 years. Meanwhile, booksellers had to pay enormous storage fees. Those couldn't be waived, they were told, because the storage facilities were privately owned (by customs officials, a bookstore owner suggested ruefully). One bookstore had to pay $4,000 on a $10,000 shipment. 

The day after the first shipment of books was released, an internal memo circulated in customs congratulating themselves for finally levying a duty on books, though no mention was made of their pride in breaking an international treaty.

Please forward this or disseminate this in any way you can, in the name of reading. 

23 CommentsChronological   Reverse   Threaded
challengerred wrote on May 10, '09
The local officials in our customs department are a bunch of idiots. You can't just "misinterpret" an international treaty like that; it has one law and one law only that should be followed. I think we didn't even read the law correctly.
Out of a billion countries worldwide, only the Philippines broke this rule. This is probably the most embarrassing thing we ever did, and we even took pride in it, for goodness' sakes.
twishastarr wrote on May 10, '09
I don't get it. =))
benj4x4 wrote on May 10, '09
it's impossible. a breach on an international treaty would have been reported on our local news distributors (newspapers, tv, etc). hoax! sana :P haha.
meemaii24 wrote on May 10, '09
asa pang totoo yan. we could've heard or read about it na kung gnun.
yan ang hirap sa mga officials, isang mali lang tulad ng comma, nagkakagulo na.

i hope this isn't true.
for the sake of all bookworms around the globe! =))
sandras20 wrote on May 10, '09
loser. :))
illilude wrote on May 10, '09
GAH! People are writing to UNESCO about this na. Sana they respond.
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
asa pang totoo yan. we could've heard or read about it na kung gnun.
yan ang hirap sa mga officials, isang mali lang tulad ng comma, nagkakagulo na.

i hope this isn't true.
for the sake of all bookworms around the globe! =))
my dear, but kuya GIno knows about this...THE GINO!!!!!!!
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
my dear, but kuya GIno knows about this...THE GINO!!!!!!!
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
The local officials in our customs department are a bunch of idiots. You can't just "misinterpret" an international treaty like that; it has one law and one law only that should be followed. I think we didn't even read the law correctly.
Out of a billion countries worldwide, only the Philippines broke this rule. This is probably the most embarrassing thing we ever did, and we even took pride in it, for goodness' sakes.
hay! IKR!
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
hay! IKR!
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
I don't get it. =))
intindihin mo dear, it concerns so much ur love for books....
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
intindihin mo dear, it concerns so much ur love for books....
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
GAH! People are writing to UNESCO about this na. Sana they respond.
this is SAD!
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
this is SAD!
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
loser. :))
IKR!
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
IKR!
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
asa pang totoo yan. we could've heard or read about it na kung gnun.
yan ang hirap sa mga officials, isang mali lang tulad ng comma, nagkakagulo na.

i hope this isn't true.
for the sake of all bookworms around the globe! =))
READ NEWS dear (well i don't! but ate'd says so...therefore it is true...since she's the type of person who says things based on facts....) i think its published somewhere
rochexdizon wrote on May 10, '09
READ NEWS dear (well i don't! but ate'd says so...therefore it is true...since she's the type of person who says things based on facts....) i think its published somewhere
benj4x4 wrote on May 11, '09
I stand corrected. :D it was reported, and ang nakaka inis pa dun, pati books kinukurakot na hahaha :D sorry :D
rochexdizon wrote on May 11, '09
benj4x4 said
I stand corrected. :D it was reported, and ang nakaka inis pa dun, pati books kinukurakot na hahaha :D sorry :D
hayzzz...i hate the goverment na...haha
rochexdizon wrote on May 11, '09
hayzzz...i hate the goverment na...haha
Add a Comment